Home > Could Not > Could Not Start Boot Splash Success Ubuntu

Could Not Start Boot Splash Success Ubuntu

What to do when using your private key from another computer? Enable the respective DM-plymouth Unit (GDM,KDM,Lightdm,LXDM units provided) 26/08/2014 13:00:35 [2014-08-26 09:44] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] E.g. : systemctl enable kdm-plymouth.service 26/08/2014 13:00:35 [2014-08-26 09:44] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] 26/08/2014 13:00:35 [2014-08-26 09:44] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] 5. I haven't rebooted, so I'm still in Gnome running the 2.6.35.24 kernel. update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated) Processing triggers for initramfs-tools .. http://strobelfilms.com/could-not/could-not-start-boot-splash.html

on January 29, 2011 at 11:34 am | Reply brdhse1 All tried, none worked. Another option would be to have mountall prompt directly on the console, doing its own serialization of the prompts (even though successful mounts / fscks continue to be run in parallel). How can I tell whether a generator was just-started? Keeping your system compositor running from the initramfs post-boot isn't really ideal, particularly for low-memory systems; whereas killing the system compositor and restarting it will make it harder to provide a

When it comes to specific firmware issues, you may need to start a thread at the Ubuntu forums (quite often, someone will point you towards a patch). Plymouth provides a splash screen, but that's not what plymouth is. Your system could be in an unusable state. Go down to the line starting with linux and add your parameter foo=bar to its end.

Plenty of info out there if not: http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=update-initramfs+is+disabled+since+running+on+read-only+media. Defendant"? If a filesystem is missing or fails an fsck, mountall may need to interact with the user to decide how to handle it. But, but, but … when I run the * update-initramfs -u I get a bunch of messages complaining about the state of the casper-functions script: update-initfrmfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-41-generic-pae .: 13: can't

Is there a way out of this deadlock? Now press Ctrl + x to boot. on August 13, 2012 at 4:12 am | Reply ganesh http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/package/core/quantal/main/base/initramfs-tools-bin on December 14, 2012 at 11:34 pm | Reply umesh kumar I am using win xp and ubuntu 10.4 i news As I don't want to trash my new setup, I'll await your comments before proceeding, thanks. - Netrunner 2015.11 "Rolling" (x64) - AMD A6-6400K APU :: 8GB RAM - nVidia GT610

I did what you suggested. So we reject the idea of solving the problem of serializing prompts by making mountall serialize all its filesystem checks. on March 2, 2012 at 5:33 am | Reply grub problem […] It is possible that you don't have all the drivers/modules needed compiled into your kernel to access hard drives Something messed up along the line and removed the init img in /boot but initramfs-tools still thought there was a kernel.

on January 28, 2011 at 3:18 pm | Reply Ubuntu Genius Did you look at the comment by Alecks? Cheers. on January 28, 2011 at 2:50 pm | Reply brdhse1 I'm having a similar problem, where update-initramfs hangs when trying to install a new kernel. I tried everything in your thread, but the problem persists.

on February 5, 2011 at 2:56 am | Reply Johnny Upgraded my RAM from 8GB to 16GB, and took out a GTS250 and put in an ATI5450. this contact form Where things get interesting (and, typically, controversial) is the way in which mountall leverages plymouth to achieve this. Leading up to the release, a meme making the rounds on Planet Debian has been to play a #newinwheezy game, calling out some of the many new packages in 7.0 that When pasting into the Terminal, use Ctrl+Shift+V, NOT Ctrl+V.

Just had a thought ..... A published paper stole my unpublished results from a science fair Law case title convention: Why sometimes not "Plaintiff v. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email (required) (Address never made public) Name (required) Website You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. (LogOut/Change) You are http://strobelfilms.com/could-not/could-not-start-boot-splash-no-such-device.html and lost data.

Could not start boot spalsh because can't access needed shared library Started by MacLone, Mar 20 2011 10:00 PM Please log in to reply 3 replies to this topic #1 MacLone I'm assuming you can get to the GRUB menu from your comment - if not, hold down your Shift key while booting. Mount the partition your Ubuntu Installation is on.

BUT, under Ubuntu (and derivatives) I have a script that always fixes that for me, and I hadn't dug into things enough to have any idea whether it could be the

Can you callqdbus?" Ubuntu 13.04/Nautilus 3.6 Fix: Open Selected Folder in Image Viewer or Movie Player with Nautilus-Actions Ubuntu 13.04/Nautilus 3.6 Fix: Open Selected Folders in New Windows with Nautilus-Actions Rhythmbox If it just won't stop, the last thing you want to do is reboot without having tackled this, so here is a work-around that may help. Find Reply « Next Oldest | Next Newest » Pages (2): 1 2 Next » Possibly Related Threads... Sign up for a new, free business service from TechRadar Pro to help you in your job delivering high value, original content direct to your inbox GET MY FREE MAGAZINE No

Is there any solution to this without loosing the data inside? on December 15, 2015 at 7:10 pm | Reply ghostnetwork my simple first for this was fsck /dev/sda2 (hit enter) then yes to everything until it boots normally. apt-get upgrade is safer, as it won't remove packages if there's a conflict (ie: use with caution, and as a last resort , as it could render the system unstable). http://strobelfilms.com/could-not/could-not-start-boot-splash-no-such-file-or-directory.html And, as an absolute last resort, you can even open Synaptic and remove the latest kernel, then reinstall it (take note of all package names when uninstalling, to make sure you

Whatever the error is (and there's many of them) you wouldn't be the first to encounter it, so the answer is likely on the web already, either as a guide someone With Mir on the horizon for Ubuntu, however, and its clean separation between system and session compositors, it's possible that using a Mir backend - that can continue running even after If that works, you can always try and reinstall it via Synaptic (me, I didn't chance it, and just waited for the next kernel to come out). Maybe the /usr/share or sth like this isn mounted or whatever ...

Open a Terminal 3. https://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/20…re-you-reboot/ […] on April 8, 2012 at 8:10 pm | Reply Monika Dash I have both Windows 7 and Ubuntu 10.04 installed on my laptop with a memory allocation of 220 When Ubuntu first started requiring plymouth as an essential component of the boot infrastructure, there was a lot of outrage from users, particularly from Ubuntu Server users, who believed this was Find Reply roadrunner Code Specialist Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 172 #9 29th August 2014, 9:26 (This post was last modified: 29th August 2014, 9:39 by roadrunner.) OK, thanks for that and

Ubuntu Logo, Ubuntu and Canonical Canonical Ltd. That worked for me when I had kernel issues, and successfully got to the desktop and removed the offending kernel and related packages via Synaptic. Before attempting any advanced tweaks on your own, it pays to try the recommended option first, then ask for help on the forums using the output logs generated – this will One possible way to handle this would be for mountall to serialize the fsck's / mounts.